Research misconduct complaints and institutional logics: the case of Hans Eysenck and the British Psychological Society

Craig, Russell, Pelosi, Anthony and Tourish, Dennis (2021) Research misconduct complaints and institutional logics: the case of Hans Eysenck and the British Psychological Society. Journal of Health Psychology, 26 (2). pp. 296-311. ISSN 1359-1053

[img] HTML - Accepted Version
Restricted to SRO admin only

Download (50kB)
[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivatives.

Download (286kB)
[img] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial.

Download (148kB)

Abstract

A formal complaint was lodged with the British Psychological Society in 1995 that alleged serious scientific misconduct by Hans J Eysenck. The complaint referred to research into the links between personality traits and the causes, prevention and treatment of cancer and heart disease. Using a framework of institutional logics, we criticise the Society’s decision not to hear this complaint at a full disciplinary hearing. We urge the BPS to investigate this complaint afresh. We also support calls for the establishment of an independent National Research Integrity Ombudsperson to deal more effectively with allegations of research misconduct.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: University of Sussex Business School > Management
SWORD Depositor: Mx Elements Account
Depositing User: Mx Elements Account
Date Deposited: 22 Sep 2020 08:25
Last Modified: 05 Feb 2021 08:30
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/93878

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update