DIENES_Psychology_of_Consciousness_JUNE_2020_author_copy.pdf (398.31 kB)
How to use and report Bayesian hypothesis tests
This article provides guidance on interpreting and reporting Bayesian hypothesis tests, to aid their understanding. To use and report a Bayesian hypothesis test, predicted effect sizes must be specified. The article will provide guidance in specifying effect sizes of interest (which also will be of relevance to those using frequentist statistics). First, if a minimally interesting effect size can be specified, a null interval is defined as the effects smaller in magnitude than the minimally interesting effect. Then the proportion of the posterior distribution that falls in the null interval indicates the plausibility of the null interval hypothesis. Second, if a rough scale of effect can be determined, a Bayes factor can indicate evidence for a model representing that scale of effect versus a model of the null hypothesis. Both methods allow data to count against a theory that predicts a difference. By contrast, nonsignificance does not count against such a theory. Various examples are provided including the suitability of Bayesian analyses for demonstrating the absence of conscious perception under putative subliminal conditions, and its presence in supraliminal conditions.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Accepted version
Journal
Psychology of Consciousness: Theory Research, and PracticeISSN
2326-5531Publisher
American Psychological AssociationExternal DOI
Department affiliated with
- Psychology Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2020-08-21First Open Access (FOA) Date
2020-08-21First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2020-08-21Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC