University of Sussex
Browse
1-s2.0-S0305750X20302436-main.pdf (2.03 MB)

Dispossessed by decarbonisation: reducing vulnerability, injustice, and inequality in the lived experience of low-carbon pathways

Download (2.03 MB)
Version 2 2023-06-07, 08:55
Version 1 2023-06-07, 07:41
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-07, 08:55 authored by Benjamin SovacoolBenjamin Sovacool, Bruno Turnheim, Andrew HookAndrew Hook, Andrea BrockAndrea Brock, Mari MartiskainenMari Martiskainen
This study examines the justice and equity implications of four low-carbon transitions, and it reveals the “lived experiences” of decarbonisation as manifested across Africa and Europe. Based on extensive, original mixed methods empirical research – including expert interviews, focus groups, internet forums, community interviews, and extended site visits and naturalistic observation – it asks: How are four specific decarbonisation pathways linked to negative impacts within specific communities? Relatedly, what vulnerabilities do these transitions exacerbate in these communities? Lastly, how can such vulnerabilities be better addressed with policy? The paper documents a troublesome cohabitation between French wineries and nuclear power, the negative effects on labor groups and workers in Eastern Germany by a transition to solar energy, the stark embodied externalities in electronic waste (e-waste) flows from smart meters accumulating in Ghana, and the precarious exploitation of children involved in cobalt mining for electric vehicle batteries in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The aims and objectives of the study are threefold: (1) to showcase how four very different vulnerable communities have been affected by the negative impacts of decarbonisation; (2) to reveal tensions and tradeoffs between European transitions and local and global justice concerns; and (3) to inform energy and climate policy. In identifying these objectives, our goal is not to stop or slow down all low-carbon transitions. Rather, the study suggests that the research and policy communities ought to account for, and seek to minimize, a broader range of social and environmental sustainability risks. Sustainability transitions and decarbonisation pathways must become more egalitarian, fair, and just.

Funding

INNOPATHS -Managing Technology Transition; G2118; EUROPEAN UNION; 730403

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

World Development

ISSN

0305-750X

Publisher

Elsevier

Volume

137

Page range

1-14

Article number

a105116

Department affiliated with

  • SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2020-08-04

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2020-10-12

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2020-08-04

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC