Published online version.pdf (23.41 MB)
A positive state obligation to counter dehumanisation under international human rights law
Version 2 2023-06-07, 08:52
Version 1 2023-06-07, 07:34
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-07, 08:52 authored by Stephanie BerryStephanie BerryInternational human rights law (IHRL) was established in the aftermath of World War II to prevent a reoccurrence of the atrocities committed in the name of fascism. Central to this aim was the recognition that out-groups are particularly vulnerable to rights violations committed by the in-group. Yet it is increasingly apparent that out-groups are still subject to a wide range of rights violations, including those associated with mass atrocities. These rights violations are facilitated by the dehumanisation of the out-group by the in-group. Consequently, this article argues that the creation of IHRL treaties and corresponding monitoring mechanisms should be viewed as the first step towards protecting out-groups from human rights violations. By adopting the lens of dehumanisation, this article demonstrates that if IHRL is to achieve its purpose, IHRL monitoring mechanisms must recognise the connection between dehumanisation and rights violations and develop a positive State obligation to counter dehumanisation. The four treaties explored in this article, the European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination, all establish positive State obligations to prevent hate speech and to foster tolerant societies. These obligations should, in theory, allow IHRL monitoring mechanisms to address dehumanisation. However, their interpretation of the positive State obligation to foster tolerant societies does not go far enough to counter unconscious dehumanisation and requires more detailed elaboration.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Erasmus Law ReviewISSN
2210-2671Publisher
Eleven International PublishingExternal DOI
Issue
3Volume
13Page range
5-20Department affiliated with
- Law Publications
Research groups affiliated with
- Sussex Centre for Human Rights Research Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2020-07-20First Open Access (FOA) Date
2020-07-20First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2020-07-17Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC