From thermal comfort to conflict: the contested control and usage of domestic smart heating in the United Kingdom

Sovacool, Benjamin K, Martiskainen, Mari, Osborn, Jody, Anaam, Amal and Lipson, Matthew (2020) From thermal comfort to conflict: the contested control and usage of domestic smart heating in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 69. a101566. ISSN 2214-6296

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivatives.

Download (471kB)

Abstract

The possible benefits of the ongoing digitization and enhancement of energy services with smart technologies has been extensively documented in the literature, but is there also scope for smart systems to lead to household conflicts? In this study, using data from the Energy Systems Catapult's Living Laboratory, we explore a fundamental energy service (heat) utilized in buildings from a novel angle: social conflict. We define social conflict as oppositional goals, aims, and values held by different people. We draw from three sets of primary data—diary studies and blogging via mobile ethnography, telephone interviews, and household interviews—involving 100 homes across Birmingham (West Midlands), Bridgend (Wales), Manchester (Greater Manchester), and Newcastle (Northumberland) in the United Kingdom. We identify five different forms of “thermal conflict”: parents versus children, hosts versus guests, roommates vs. each other, landlords vs. tenants, and couples vs. each other. After documenting the presence of 20 specific examples of conflict, we then discuss how they differ by location (intrinsic vs. extrinsic), type (preference, attitude, and variety) and values (hedonic, egoistic, altruistic, biospheric). We conclude with implications for energy and buildings research and policy more broadly, noting that thermal conflicts in the home differ in their location or cause. Moreover, thermal conflicts differ in their severity, with some occurring as more minor annoyances over preferences, but others relating attitudes, where heating actions or preferences become a proxy for something else, and emit strong feelings about how household members view another person as lazy, careless or wasteful. A variety of values remain attached to heating conflicts, with hedonic (self-comfort, self-pleasure), egoistic (saving money, control) and altruistic (helping others, making others comfortable) values almost evenly reflected across our examples.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: smart energy, heating and cooling, living lab, energy practices, smart homes, big data
Schools and Departments: University of Sussex Business School > SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit
Subjects: H Social Sciences
Depositing User: Francisco Dominguez
Date Deposited: 22 Apr 2020 07:52
Last Modified: 06 Jun 2021 01:00
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/90966

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update
Project NameSussex Project NumberFunderFunder Ref
UK Centre for Research on Energy DemandG2424EPSRC-ENGINEERING & PHYSICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCILEP/R035288/1
SWS Heat: Developing the next generation technologies of renewable electricity and heating/coolingG2475EUROPEAN UNION764025