University of Sussex
Browse
__smbhome.uscs.susx.ac.uk_tjk30_Documents_2019-79283-001.pdf (268.16 kB)

Noncoercive human intelligence gathering

Download (268.16 kB)
Version 2 2023-06-12, 09:17
Version 1 2023-06-09, 20:01
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 09:17 authored by Coral J Dando, Thomas OrmerodThomas Ormerod
Despite widespread recognition that coercive methods for intelligence gathering are unethical and counterproductive, there is an absence of empirical evidence for effective alternatives. We compared two non-coercive methods - the Modified Cognitive Interview (MCI) and Controlled Cognitive Engagement (CCE), adapted for intelligence gathering by adding a moral frame to encourage interviewees to consciously consider sharing intelligence. Participants from the general population experienced an unexpected live event where equipment was damaged, and an argument ensued. Prior to interview, participants were incentivised to withhold information about a target individual implicated in the event. CCE yielded more target information, more frequently than MCI (67% vs. 36%). Similarly, framing yielded target information more often (65% vs. 39%). The effects of interview and framing appear to be additive rather than interactive. Our results indicate combining non-coercive interview methods with moral framing can enhance intelligence gain.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

ISSN

0096-3445

Publisher

American Psychological Association

Department affiliated with

  • Psychology Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2020-01-02

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2020-01-02

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2019-12-20

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC