University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Googling for 'opposites': a web-based study of antonym canonicity

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 06:19 authored by Steven Jones, Carita Paradis, Lynne MurphyLynne Murphy, Caroline Willners
This paper seeks to explain why some semantically-opposed word pairs are more likely to be seen as canonical antonyms (for example, cold/hot) than others (icy/scorching, cold/fiery, freezing/hot, etc.). Specifically, it builds on research which has demonstrated that, in discourse, antonyms are inclined to favour certain frames, such as ‘X and Y alike’, ‘from X to Y’ and ‘either X or Y’ (Justeson and Katz, 1991; etc.), and to serve a limited range of discourse functions (Jones, 2002). Our premise is that the more canonical an antonym pair is, the greater the fidelity with which it will occupy such frames. Since an extremely large corpus is needed to identify meaningful patterns of co-occurrence, we turn to Internet data for this research. As well as enabling the notion of antonym canonicity to be revisited from a more empirical perspective, this approach also allows us to evaluate the appropriateness (and assess the risks) of using the World Wide Web as a corpus for studies into certain types of low-frequency textual phenomena.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

Corpora

ISSN

1749-5032

Issue

2

Volume

2

Page range

129-155

Department affiliated with

  • English Publications

Notes

Completed under a British Academy Small Grant. Principal Investigator = ML Murphy

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2012-02-06

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC