University of Sussex
Browse
09564624211023018.pdf (907.63 kB)

Sexual healthcare professionals’ views on the rapid provision of remote services at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study

Download (907.63 kB)
Version 2 2023-06-12, 09:53
Version 1 2023-06-10, 00:04
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 09:53 authored by Alexandria Lunt, Carrie LlewellynCarrie Llewellyn, Jake Bayley, Tom Nadarzynski
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing measures forced sexual health services to engage with patients remotely. We aimed to understand perceived barriers and facilitators to the provision of digital sexual health services during the first months of the pandemic. Methods: An online survey and qualitative interviews with UK sexual healthcare professionals recruited online and via snowball sampling were conducted in May–July 2020. Results: Amongst 177 respondents (72% female, 86% White, mean age = 46, SD = 9), most utilised telephone and email as their main communication channels; however, their perceived effectiveness varied (94% and 66%, respectively). Most agreed that staff needed additional training (89%), the available technology was not adequate (66%) and health professionals were hesitant to provide online consultations (46%). They had positive attitudes towards digitalisation, improving service quality and cost-effectiveness but were concerned about exacerbating health inequalities. Discussion: The study identifies a need for clear guidelines and training around the use of digital tools as well as a demand for investment in hardware and software required for the provision of remote services. Future research needs to explore the acceptability, safety and effectiveness of various digital tools to narrow health inequalities in sexual health service users.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

International Journal of STD and AIDS

ISSN

0956-4624

Publisher

SAGE

Department affiliated with

  • Primary Care and Public Health Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2021-06-11

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2021-06-11

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2021-06-11

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC