University of Sussex
Browse
POM_Organizational_Who Takes Risks - Final Accepted Version.pdf (1.49 MB)

Who takes risks? A framework on organizational risk-taking during sudden-onset disasters

Download (1.49 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-10, 00:03 authored by Iana Shaheen, Arash Azadegan, Samuel Roscoe
Do humanitarian organizations exhibit similar risk-taking behavior? This study analyzed 60 interviews from 24 case studies on four types of organizations involved in disaster response: established, expanding, extending, and emergent. By elaborating on organizational attention theory, this study investigated how organizational tasks, structures, attention, and context combine to influence organizational risk-taking behavior by different organizational types during sudden-onset disasters. Counterintuitively, the results indicate that two organizational types shift their risk-taking behavior in reverse directions during disaster response stages. Expanding organizations (e.g., primary disaster response NGOs) are generally risk-averse during the immediate response stage but become risk-taking during the short-term recovery stage. In contrast, extending organizations (e.g., homeless shelters) are risk-taking during the immediate response but become risk-averse during short-term recovery. While established organizations are generally risk-averse, the study differentiated between two sub-types of established organizations with nuanced differences in risk-taking behavior. Finally, while emergent organizations show a propensity toward risk-taking, the results differentiate between two emergent sub-types, where the socially emergent sub-type (e.g., church volunteer groups) shows more pronounced risk-taking behavior than the enterprise emergent subtype (e.g., corporate volunteer groups). The study contributes to organizational attention theory by showing how the varied risk-taking behaviors are related to the three dimensions of performance (resource agility, resource adaptability, and resource alignment), commonly referred to as the Triple-A model. The study implications provide researchers and managers with a framework to help understand and predict risk-taking behavior by organizational types and sub-types during disaster relief operations.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Accepted version

Journal

Production and Operations Management

ISSN

1059-1478

Publisher

Wiley

Department affiliated with

  • Management Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2021-06-07

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2021-06-07

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC