dech.12669.pdf (193.71 kB)
Remote (dis)engagement: shifting corporate risk to the ‘Bottom of the pyramid'
Version 2 2023-06-12, 09:52
Version 1 2023-06-09, 23:55
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 09:52 authored by Kate Roll, Catherine Dolan, Dinah RajakDinah RajakUntapped markets are often deemed institutional voids, terra incognita ripe with economic possibility. The conversion of institutional voids into viable markets has become the ambition of many corporations today, which view marginal and under-served areas such as urban slums as opportunities to achieve the dual aims of market growth and poverty reduction, particularly through ‘bottom of the pyramid’ (BoP) programmes. This article examines how firms manage institutional voids and the consequences of these approaches for workers through a case study of a BoP ‘route to market’ programme designed by a global food manufacturer in Kibera, Africa's largest slum, located in Nairobi. Instead of engaging with Kibera by upgrading informal markets or generating formal employment, the corporation focused on harnessing existing informal systems through composite arrangements of NGOs, social networks and informal enterprises, a strategy the authors term ‘remote (dis)engagement’. The article describes the logics and outcome of this strategy of formal engagement with informal markets, concluding that the BoP business model depends on ‘gig practices’ of flexibility, irregular work and insecurity to realize the much-heralded ‘fortune at the bottom of the pyramid’.
Funding
Norwegian energy companies abroad: Expanding the anthropological understanding of corporate responsibility; G1748; RESEARCH COUNCIL OF NORWAY; 153400/240617
Doing Good by Doing Well'.; G1720; ESRC-ECONOMIC & SOCIAL RESEARCH COUNCIL; ES/L000636/1
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Development and ChangeISSN
0012-155XPublisher
WileyExternal DOI
Issue
4Volume
52Page range
878-901Department affiliated with
- Anthropology Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2021-05-24First Open Access (FOA) Date
2021-07-08First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2021-05-24Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC