Creutzig_2021_Environ._Res._Lett._16_033001.pdf (2.89 MB)
Reviewing the scope and thematic focus of 100,000 publications on energy consumption, services and social aspects of climate change: a big data approach to demand-side mitigation
Version 2 2023-06-12, 09:39
Version 1 2023-06-09, 22:37
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 09:39 authored by Felix Creutzig, Max Callaghan, Anjali Ramakrishnan, Aneeque Javaid, Leila Niamir, Jan Minx, Finn Müller-Hansen, Benjamin SovacoolBenjamin Sovacool, Zakia Afroz, Mark Andor, Miklos Antal, Victor Court, Nandini Das, Andrew HookAndrew Hook, Steven SorrellSteven Sorrell, othersAs current action remains insufficient to meet the goals of the Paris agreement let alone to stabilize the climate, there is increasing hope that solutions related to demand, services and social aspects of climate change mitigation can close the gap. However, given these topics are not investigated by a single epistemic community, the literature base underpinning the associated research continues to be undefined. Here, we aim to delineate a plausible body of literature capturing a comprehensive spectrum of demand, services and social aspects of climate change mitigation. As method we use a novel double-stacked expert—machine learning research architecture and expert evaluation to develop a typology and map key messages relevant for climate change mitigation within this body of literature. First, relying on the official key words provided to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by governments (across 17 queries), and on specific investigations of domain experts (27 queries), we identify 121?165 non-unique and 99?065 unique academic publications covering issues relevant for demand-side mitigation. Second, we identify a literature typology with four key clusters: policy, housing, mobility, and food/consumption. Third, we systematically extract key content-based insights finding that the housing literature emphasizes social and collective action, whereas the food/consumption literatures highlight behavioral change, but insights also demonstrate the dynamic relationship between behavioral change and social norms. All clusters point to the possibility of improved public health as a result of demand-side solutions. The centrality of the policy cluster suggests that political actions are what bring the different specific approaches together. Fourth, by mapping the underlying epistemic communities we find that researchers are already highly interconnected, glued together by common interests in sustainability and energy demand. We conclude by outlining avenues for interdisciplinary collaboration, synthetic analysis, community building, and by suggesting next steps for evaluating this body of literature.
Funding
UK Centre for Research on Energy Demand; G2424; EPSRC-ENGINEERING & PHYSICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCIL; EP/R035288/1
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Environmental Research LettersISSN
1748-9326Publisher
IOP PublishingExternal DOI
Issue
3Volume
16Page range
1-14Article number
a033001Department affiliated with
- SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2021-01-05First Open Access (FOA) Date
2021-01-05First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2021-01-05Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC