1069397120979571.pdf (125.85 kB)
Is an emphasis on dignity, honor and face more an attribute of individuals or of cultural groups?
Version 2 2023-06-12, 09:35
Version 1 2023-06-09, 22:13
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 09:35 authored by Peter B Smith, Matthew EasterbrookMatthew Easterbrook, Yasin Koc, Vivian Miu-Chi Lun, Dona Papastylianou, Lusine Grigoryan, Claudio Torres, Maria Efremova, Bushra Hassan, Ammar Abbas, Abd Halim Ahmad, Ahmed al-Bayati, Heyla A Selim, Joel Anderson, Susan E Cross, othersThis study compares the individual-level and sample-level predictive utility of a measure of the cultural logics of dignity, honor, and face. University students in 29 samples from 24 nations used a simple measure to rate their perceptions of the interpersonal cultural logic characterizing their local culture. The nomological net of these measures was then explored. Key dependent measures included three different facets of independent versus interdependent self-construal, relevant attitudes and values, reported handling of actual interpersonal conflicts, and responses to normative settings. Multilevel analyses revealed both individual- and sample-level effects but the dignity measure showed more individual-level effects, whereas sample-level effects were relatively more important with the face measure. The implications of this contrast are discussed.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Cross-Cultural ResearchISSN
1069-3971Publisher
SAGE PublicationsExternal DOI
Page range
1-32Department affiliated with
- Psychology Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2020-11-19First Open Access (FOA) Date
2020-11-19First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2020-11-18Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC