Age specific recruitment and retention to a large multicentre observational breast cancer trial in older women: the Age Gap Trial

Todd, Annaliza, Martin, Charlene, Morgan, Jenna, Herbert, Esther, Bradburn, Mike, Burton, Maria, Reed, Malcolm W R, Chater, Tim, Pemberton, Kirsty, Walters, Stephen, Cheung, Kwok Leung, Audisio, Riccardo A, Ring, Alistair, Robinson, Thompson, Green, Tracy, Gath, Jacqui and Wyld, Lynda (2020) Age specific recruitment and retention to a large multicentre observational breast cancer trial in older women: the Age Gap Trial. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. ISSN 1879-4068

[img] PDF - Draft Version
Restricted to SRO admin only

Download (3MB)
[img] PDF (Article in press version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivatives.

Download (808kB)

Abstract

Introduction
Recruitment and retention are two of the most important factors in successfully running clinical trials. Many trials encounter problems with both, causing delays or preventing study progress. These issues are greater in older adults and patients with cancer.

Materials and methods
We assessed recruitment and retention in a large, multicentre, observational breast cancer study in older female patients (>70 years, N = 3440). Data collected by the Age Gap study were used to assess rates of, and reasons for, patients not being recruited or retained. Statistical analysis assessed the impact of age as a predictor of recruitment and retention.

Results
Between February 2013 and June 2018, 6876 patients were screened and 3456 were consented across 56 United Kingdom (UK) breast units. Reasons for non-recruitment included ineligibility, clinician issues, staffing resource issues, patients' lack of interest or time and trial burden. In comparison with the age demographics of patients with breast cancer in the UK, women aged 70–75 years were over-represented compared to older age groups. Logistic regression demonstrated that older age significantly reduced the odds of consent (OR = 0.96, CI: 0.938–0.982; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age (p < 0.001), markers of poor functional ability (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (p = 0.011)) and instrumental activities of daily living (p = 0.026) were significant predictors of withdrawal.

Discussion
This study has demonstrated that selection and attrition bias for age are apparent despite a range of ‘age friendly’ study design measures. Exploration of the underlying reasons for this and development of measures to address this should be the focus of further research.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: Brighton and Sussex Medical School > Clinical and Experimental Medicine
SWORD Depositor: Mx Elements Account
Depositing User: Mx Elements Account
Date Deposited: 28 Oct 2020 08:44
Last Modified: 28 Oct 2020 09:00
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/94631

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update