University of Sussex
Browse
PIIS235239642030219X.pdf (1.86 MB)

Repeated 5-day cycles of low dose aldesleukin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (IMODALS): a phase 2a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Download (1.86 MB)
Version 2 2023-06-07, 08:51
Version 1 2023-06-07, 07:28
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-07, 08:51 authored by William Camu, Marius Mickunas, Jean-Luc Veyrune, Christine Payan, Cecilia Garlanda, Massimo Locati, Raul Juntas-Morales, Nicolas Pageot, Andrea Malaspina, Ulf Andreasson, Janine Kirby, Carey Suehs, Safa Saker, Christophe Masseguin, John De Vos, Henrik Zetterberg, Pamela J Shaw, Ammar Al-Chalabi, Nigel LeighNigel Leigh, Timothy Tree, Gilbert Bensimon
Background Low-dose interleukin-2 (ld-IL-2) enhances regulatory T-cell (Treg) function in auto-inflammatory conditions. Neuroinflammation being a pathogenic feature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), we evaluated the pharmacodynamics and safety of ld-IL-2 in ALS subjects. Methods We performed a single centre, parallel three-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eligibility criteria included age < 75 years, disease duration < 5 years, riluzole treatment > 3 months, and a slow vital capacity = 70% of normal. Patients were randomised (1:1:1) to aldesleukin 2 MIU, 1 MIU, or placebo once daily for 5 days every 4 weeks for 3 cycles. Primary outcome was change from baseline in Treg percentage of CD4+ T cells (%Tregs) following a first cycle. Secondary laboratory outcomes included: %Treg and Treg number following repeated cycles, and plasma CCL2 and neurofilament light chain protein (NFL) concentrations as surrogate markers of efficacy. Safety outcomes included motor-function (ALSFRS-R), slow vital capacity (SVC), and adverse event reports. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02059759. Findings All randomised patients (12 per group), recruited from October 2015 to December 2015, were alive at the end of follow-up and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. No drug-related serious adverse event was observed. Non-serious adverse events occurred more frequently with the 1 and 2 MIU IL-2 doses compared to placebo, including injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms. Primary outcome analysis showed a significant increase (p < 0·0001) in %Tregs in the 2 MIU and 1 MIU arms (mean [SD]: 2 MIU: +6·2% [2·2]; 1 MIU: +3·9% [1·2]) as compared to placebo (mean [SD]: -0·49% [1·3]). Effect sizes (ES) were large in treated groups: 2 MIU ES=3·7 (IC95%: 2·3–4·9) and 1 MIU ES=3·5 (IC95%: 2·1–4·6). Secondary outcomes showed a significant increase in %Tregs following repeated cycles (p < 0·0001) as compared to placebo, and a dose-dependent decrease in plasma CCL2 (p = 0·0049). There were no significant differences amongst the three groups on plasma NFL levels. Interpretation Ld-IL-2 is well tolerated and immunologically effective in subjects with ALS. These results warrant further investigation into their eventual therapeutic impact on slowing ALS disease progression.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

EBioMedicine

ISSN

2352-3964

Publisher

Elsevier

Volume

59

Page range

1-12

Article number

a102844

Department affiliated with

  • BSMS Neuroscience Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2020-07-08

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2020-07-08

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2020-07-07

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC