__smbhome.uscs.susx.ac.uk_tjk30_Documents_2019-79283-001.pdf (268.16 kB)
Noncoercive human intelligence gathering
Version 2 2023-06-12, 09:17
Version 1 2023-06-09, 20:01
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 09:17 authored by Coral J Dando, Thomas OrmerodThomas OrmerodDespite widespread recognition that coercive methods for intelligence gathering are unethical and counterproductive, there is an absence of empirical evidence for effective alternatives. We compared two non-coercive methods - the Modified Cognitive Interview (MCI) and Controlled Cognitive Engagement (CCE), adapted for intelligence gathering by adding a moral frame to encourage interviewees to consciously consider sharing intelligence. Participants from the general population experienced an unexpected live event where equipment was damaged, and an argument ensued. Prior to interview, participants were incentivised to withhold information about a target individual implicated in the event. CCE yielded more target information, more frequently than MCI (67% vs. 36%). Similarly, framing yielded target information more often (65% vs. 39%). The effects of interview and framing appear to be additive rather than interactive. Our results indicate combining non-coercive interview methods with moral framing can enhance intelligence gain.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Journal of Experimental Psychology: GeneralISSN
0096-3445Publisher
American Psychological AssociationExternal DOI
Department affiliated with
- Psychology Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2020-01-02First Open Access (FOA) Date
2020-01-02First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2019-12-20Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC