__smbhome.uscs.susx.ac.uk_tjk30_Documents_untitled.pdf (6.31 MB)
The decarbonisation divide: contextualizing landscapes of low-carbon exploitation and toxicity in Africa
Version 2 2023-06-12, 09:17
Version 1 2023-06-09, 19:56
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 09:17 authored by Benjamin SovacoolBenjamin Sovacool, Andrew HookAndrew Hook, Mari MartiskainenMari Martiskainen, Andrea BrockAndrea Brock, Bruno TurnheimMuch academic research on low-carbon transitions focuses on the diffusion or use of innovations such as electric vehicles or solar panels, but overlooks or obscures downstream and upstream processes, such as mining or waste flows. Yet it is at these two extremes where emerging low-carbon transitions in mobility and electricity are effectively implicated in toxic pollution, biodiversity loss, exacerbation of gender inequality, exploitation of child labor, and the subjugation of ethnic minorities. We conceptualize these processes as part of an emerging “decarbonisation divide.” To illustrate this divide with clear insights for political ecology, sustainability transitions, and energy justice, this study draws from extensive fieldwork examining cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and the processing and recycling of electronic waste in Ghana. It utilizes original data from 34 semi-structured research interviews with experts and 69 community interviews with artisanal cobalt miners, e-waste scrapyard workers, and other stakeholders, as well as 50 site visits. These visits included 30 industrial and artisanal cobalt mines in the DRC, as well as associated infrastructure such as trading depots and processing centers, and 20 visits to the Agbogbloshie scrapyard and neighborhood alongside local waste collection sites, electrical repair shops, recycling centers, and community e-waste dumps. The study proposes a concerted set of policy recommendations for how to better address issues of exploitation and toxicity, suggestions that go beyond the often-touted solutions of formalization or financing. Ultimately, the study holds that we must all, as researchers, planners, and citizens, broaden the criteria and analytical parameters we use to evaluate the sustainability of low-carbon transitions.
Funding
INNOPATHS -Managing Technology Transition; G2118; EUROPEAN UNION; 730403
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Global Environmental ChangeISSN
0959-3780Publisher
ElsevierExternal DOI
Volume
60Article number
a102028Department affiliated with
- SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2019-12-16First Open Access (FOA) Date
2020-01-31First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2019-12-12Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC