Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in Primate/Canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task

Clark, Hannah, Elsherif, Mahmoud M and Leavens, David A (2019) Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in Primate/Canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 105. pp. 178-189. ISSN 0149-7634

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Restricted to SRO admin only until 3 June 2020.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivatives.

Download (938kB)

Abstract

The Object Choice Task (OCT) is a widely used paradigm with which researchers measure the ability of a subject to comprehend deictic (directional) cues, such as pointing gestures and eye gaze. There is a widespread belief that nonhuman primates evince only a weak capacity to use deictic cues; in contrast, domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) tend to demonstrate high success rates. This pattern of canid superiority has been taken to support the Domestication Hypothesis, which posits enhancing effects of artificial selection on the sociocognitive abilities of dogs and humans. Here we review nearly two decades of published findings, using variants of the OCT. We find systematic confounds with species classification in task-relevant preparation of the subjects, in the imposition of a barrier between reward and subject, and in the specific deictic cues used to indicate the location of hidden objects. Thus, the widespread belief that dogs outperform primates on OCTs is undermined by the systematic procedural differences in the assessments of these skills, differences that are confounded with taxonomic classification.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Object choice task; canids; primates; comparative cognition
Schools and Departments: School of Psychology > Psychology
Depositing User: Sanjeedah Choudhury
Date Deposited: 04 Jun 2019 10:56
Last Modified: 20 Aug 2019 11:30
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/84083

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update