University of Sussex
Browse
Russell_et_al-2017-Journal_of_Occupational_and_Organizational_Psychology.pdf (437.48 kB)

Examining conscientiousness as a key resource in resisting email interruptions : implications for volatile resources and goal achievement

Download (437.48 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-09, 17:44 authored by Emma RussellEmma Russell, Stephen A Woods, Adrian P Banks
Within the context of the conservation of resources model, when a resource is deployed, it is depleted - albeit temporarily. However, when a 'key', stable resource, such as Conscientiousness, is activated (e.g., using a self-control strategy, such as resisting an email interruption), we predicted that (1) another, more volatile resource (affective well-being) would be impacted and that (2) this strategy would be deployed as a trade-off, allowing one to satisfy task goals, at the expense of well-being goals. We conducted an experience?sampling field study with 52 email-users dealing with their normal email as it interrupted them over the course of a half?day period. This amounted to a total of 376 email reported across the sample. Results were analysed using random coefficient hierarchical linear modelling and included cross-level interactions for Conscientiousness with strategy and well-being. Our first prediction was supported - deploying the stable, key resource of Conscientiousness depletes the volatile, fluctuating resource of affective well-being. However, our second prediction was not fully realized. Although resisting or avoiding an email interruption was perceived to hinder well-being goal achievement by Conscientious people, it had neither a positive nor negative impact on task goal achievement. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. Practitioner points: It may be necessary for highly Conscientious people to turn off their email interruption alerts at work, in order to avoid the strain that results from an activation-resistance mechanism afforded by the arrival of a new email. Deploying key resources means that volatile resources may be differentially spent, depending on one's natural tendencies and how these interact with the work task and context. This suggests that the relationship between demands and resources is not always direct and predictable. Practitioners may wish to appraise the strategies they use to deal with demands such as email at work, to identify if these strategies are assisting with task or well-being goal achievement, or whether they have become defunct through automation.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

ISSN

0963-1798

Publisher

Wiley

Issue

3

Volume

90

Page range

407-435

Department affiliated with

  • Business and Management Publications

Notes

This work was supported by the ESRC grant number: R42200134135, and the University of Surrey.

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2019-05-14

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2019-05-14

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2019-05-14

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC