WALTER 2019 Defending Images.pdf (327.6 kB)
Defending images in Pecock's Repressor: caritas, the absent friend and the sense of touch
Reginald Pecock's defense of orthodox practices in the Repressor of Over Much Blaming of the Clergy is grounded in the biblical commandment to love God, which, following Thomas Aquinas's thoroughly Aristotelianized theology, is understood as "a friendship of man and God." Images are key tools—proxies for forms of presence—in the dual processes of learning and recollection that are needed to mediate friendship with God. In this context, the efficacy of physical images derives from the structures of human memory and imagination, which are reliant on sensory perception: physical sight thus aids the imaginative work of making present something that is absent. The paradigm of caritas as friendship surfaces powerfully in the Repressor's defense of images: Christ is the absent friend, an image of whom offers a form of presence essential to imagining, and so to loving, him. Aristotelian friendship's emphasis on presence and proximity, however, underpins Pecock's advocacy of the value of the physical image not just in terms of its appeal to the sense of sight, but also to the sense of touch: love for a friend, ordinarily fostered by presence and completed in touch, is mediated between God and man not only by seeing but also through touching an image. That Pecock's arguments about the lawfulness of image-use culminate in a powerful defense of those who caress and kiss images registers not only the strength of Lollard objection to touching images in fifteenth-century controversy, but also the under-recognized importance of touch to medieval understandings of memory, cognition, and love.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Accepted version
Journal
Studies in the Age of ChaucerISSN
0190-2407Publisher
The New Chaucer SocietyExternal DOI
Volume
41Page range
267-299Department affiliated with
- English Publications
Research groups affiliated with
- Centre for Early Modern and Medieval Studies Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2019-04-11First Open Access (FOA) Date
2019-04-12First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2019-04-10Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC