University of Sussex
Browse
__smbhome.uscs.susx.ac.uk_sc328_Desktop_Papers for SRO_MORCOM_Brain Research_Jul_2015_author_copy.pdf (913.25 kB)

Resisting false recognition: an ERP study of lure discrimination

Download (913.25 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-09, 17:22 authored by Alexa MorcomAlexa Morcom
There is keen interest in what enables rememberers to differentiate true from false memories and which strategies are likely to be the most effective. This study measured electrical brain activity while healthy young adults performed a mnemonic discrimination task, deciding whether color pictures had been studied, were similar to studied pictures (lures), or were new. Between 500 – 800 ms post-stimulus, event-related potentials (ERPs) for correctly recognized studied pictures and falsely recognized lures compared to those for correctly rejected novel items had a left centroparietal scalp distribution typical of the parietal old/new effect associated with recollection. This is in line with previous evidence that similar lures may elicit false or phantom recollection as opposed to just familiarity. There was no evidence of a parietal effect for correctly rejected lures as would be expected if recall-to-reject were used. The ERP old/new effects for lures also varied with individual differences in performance. Parietal effects for falsely recognized lures were larger in better performers, who successfully rejected a greater number of lures as “similar”. The better performers also showed more pronounced right frontocentral old/new effects between 800 – 1100 ms for correctly rejected and falsely recognized similar lures. The enhancement of false recollection in better performers implies false recognition of lures occurred only when more specific information was recovered about the study episodic. Together, the findings suggest reliance on recollection to decide that items were studied, supported by post-retrieval processing.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Accepted version

Journal

Brain Research

ISSN

0006-8993

Publisher

Elsevier

Volume

1624

Page range

336-348

Department affiliated with

  • Psychology Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2019-03-26

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2019-03-26

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2019-03-25

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC