SRO VERSION Migrant women charging.pdf (179.35 kB)
Why it is unethical to charge migrant women for pregnancy care in the NHS
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-09, 17:13 authored by Arianne ShahvisiArianne Shahvisi, Fionnuala FinnertyPregnancy care is chargeable for migrants who do not have indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom. Women who are not “ordinarily resident,” including prospective asylum applicants, some refused asylum-seekers, unidentified victims of trafficking, and undocumented people are required to pay substantial charges in order to access antenatal, intra-partum, and postnatal services as well as abortion care within the NHS. In this paper we consider the ethical issues generated by the exclusion of pregnancy care from the raft of services which are free to all. We argue that charging for pregnancy care amounts to sexdiscrimination, since without pregnancy care, sex may pose a barrier to good health. We also argue that charging for pregnancy care violates bodily autonomy, entrenches the sex-asymmetry of sexual responsibility, centres the male body, and produces health risks for women and neonates. We explore some of the ideological motivations for making maternity care chargeable, and suggest that its exclusion responds to rising xenophobia. We recommend that pregnancy care always be free regardless of citizenship or residence status, and briefly explore how these arguments bear on the broader moral case against chargeable healthcare for migrants.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Accepted version
Journal
Journal of Medical EthicsISSN
0306-6800Publisher
BMJ Publishing GroupExternal DOI
Department affiliated with
- BSMS Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2019-03-12First Open Access (FOA) Date
2019-05-02First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2019-03-11Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC