An examination of polygenic score risk prediction in individuals with first-episode psychosis

Vassos, Evangelos, Di Forti, Marta, Coleman, Jonathan, Iyegbe, Conrad, Prata, Diana, Euesden, Jack, O’Reilly, Paul, Curtis, Charles, Kolliakou, Anna, Patel, Hamel, Newhouse, Stephen, Traylor, Matthew, Ajnakina, Olesya, Mondelli, Valeria, Marques, Tiago Reis, Gardner-Sood, Poonam, Aitchison, Katherine J, Powell, John, Atakan, Zerrin, Greenwood, Kathryn E, Smith, Shubulade, Ismail, Khalida, Pariante, Carmine, Gaughran, Fiona, Dazzan, Paola, Markus, Hugh S, David, Anthony S, Lewis, Cathryn M, Murray, Robin M and Breen, Gerome (2017) An examination of polygenic score risk prediction in individuals with first-episode psychosis. Biological Psychiatry, 81 (6). pp. 470-477. ISSN 0006-3223

[img] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivatives.

Download (593kB)

Abstract

Background
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have successfully summarized genome-wide effects of genetic variants in schizophrenia with significant predictive power. In a clinical sample of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients, we estimated the ability of PRSs to discriminate case-control status and to predict the development of schizophrenia as opposed to other psychoses.

Methods
The sample (445 case and 265 control subjects) was genotyped on the Illumina HumanCore Exome BeadChip with an additional 828 control subjects of African ancestry genotyped on the Illumina Multi-Ethnic Genotyping Array. To calculate PRSs, we used the results from the latest Psychiatric Genomics Consortium schizophrenia meta-analysis. We examined the association of PRSs with case-control status and with schizophrenia versus other psychoses in European and African ancestry FEP patients and in a second sample of 248 case subjects with chronic psychosis.

Results
PRS had good discriminative ability of case-control status in FEP European ancestry individuals (9.4% of the variance explained, p < 10−6), but lower in individuals of African ancestry (R2 = 1.1%, p = .004). Furthermore, PRS distinguished European ancestry case subjects who went on to acquire a schizophrenia diagnosis from those who developed other psychotic disorders (R2 = 9.2%, p = .002).

Conclusions
PRS was a powerful predictor of case-control status in a European sample of patients with FEP, even though a large proportion did not have an established diagnosis of schizophrenia at the time of assessment. PRS was significantly different between those case subjects who developed schizophrenia from those who did not, although the discriminative accuracy may not yet be sufficient for clinical utility in FEP.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Genetics; GWAS; polygenic score; psychosis; risk prediction; schizophrenia
Schools and Departments: School of Psychology > Psychology
Depositing User: Sanjeedah Choudhury
Date Deposited: 11 Feb 2019 10:22
Last Modified: 02 Jul 2019 13:02
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/81828

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update