One step forward and two steps back? The ‘20 Principles’ for questioning vulnerable witnesses and the lack of an evidence-based approach

Cooper, Penny, Dando, Coral, Ormerod, Tom, Mattison, Michelle, Marchant, Ruth, Milne, Rebecca and Bull, Ray (2018) One step forward and two steps back? The ‘20 Principles’ for questioning vulnerable witnesses and the lack of an evidence-based approach. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 22 (4). pp. 392-410. ISSN 1365-7127

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Download (305kB)

Abstract

It is a widely held belief that questioning vulnerable witnesses is a specialist skill. In England and Wales vulnerable witness advocacy training built around ‘20 Principles’ has been developed and is being delivered. The 20 Principles do not cite a tested theoretical framework(s) or empirical evidence in support. This paper considers whether the 20 Principles are underpinned by research evidence. It is submitted that advocacy training and the approach to questioning witnesses in the courtroom should take into account the already available research evidence. The authors make recommendations for revision of the training and for a wider review of the approach taken to the handling of witness evidence.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Advocacy; questioning; training; vulnerable; witnesses
Schools and Departments: School of Psychology > Psychology
Research Centres and Groups: Crime Research Centre
Depositing User: Sanjeedah Choudhury
Date Deposited: 09 Oct 2018 12:02
Last Modified: 02 Jul 2019 14:19
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/79273

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update