An assessment of the state of nature in the United Kingdom_Accepted.pdf (1.55 MB)
An assessment of the state of nature in the United Kingdom: a review of findings, methods and impact
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-09, 15:01 authored by F Burns, M A Eaton, D B Hayhow, C L Outhwaite, N Al Fulaij, T A August, K L Boughey, T Brereton, A Brown, D J Bullock, T Gent, K A Haysom, N J B Isaac, D G Johns, C R Macadam, Fiona MathewsFiona Mathews, D G Noble, G D Powney, D W Sims, S M Smart, P Stroh, K J Walker, J R Webb, T J Webb, R D GregoryClear, accessible, objective metrics of species status are critical to communicate the state of biodiversity and to measure progress towards biodiversity targets. However, the population data underpinning current species status metrics is often highly skewed towards particular taxonomic groups such as birds, butterflies and mammals, primarily due to the restricted availability of high quality population data. A synoptic overview of the state of biodiversity requires sampling from a broader range of taxonomic groups. Incorporating data from a wide range of monitoring and analysis methods and considering more than one measure of species status are possible ways to achieve this. Here, we utilise measures of species’ population change and extinction risk to develop three species status metrics, a Categorical Change metric, a Species Index and a Red List metric, and populate them with a wide range of data sources from the UK, covering thousands of species from across taxonomy. The species status metrics reiterate the commonly reported decline in freshwater and terrestrial species’ status in the UK in recent decades and give little evidence that this rate of decline has slowed. The utility of species status metrics is further improved if we can extrapolate beyond the species sampled to infer the status of the community. For the freshwater and terrestrial species status metrics presented here we can do this with some confidence. Nevertheless, despite the range and number of species contributing to the species metrics, significant taxonomic bias remained and we report weighting options that could help control for this. The three metrics developed were used in the State of Nature 2016 report and indications are they reached a large number of audience members. We suggest options to improve the design and communication of these and similar metrics in the future.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Accepted version
Journal
Ecological IndicatorsISSN
1470-160XPublisher
ElsevierExternal DOI
Issue
Part 1Volume
94Page range
226-236Department affiliated with
- Evolution, Behaviour and Environment Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2018-09-11First Open Access (FOA) Date
2019-07-04First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2018-09-11Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC