International approaches to tackling corruption: what works and what doesn't?

Hough, Dan (2017) International approaches to tackling corruption: what works and what doesn't? Frontiers of Law in China, 12 (3). pp. 339-354. ISSN 1673-3428

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Available under License All Rights Reserved.

Download (246kB)


A well-developed set of international anti-corruption tools now exists. These range from broad conventions to focused initiatives in specific policy areas. This article argues that international agreements work best when they are focused and they speak to the common interests of the parties involved. Solutions need to be creative, they need to bring in a broad coalition of stakeholders and they need to be focused on specific problems. International agreements need to help states with good quality institutions of governance focus on developing transparency initiatives, accountability drives and nuanced efforts to tackle particular national variants of “legal corruption.” In countries with patchy institutions of governance the scope for international influence is broader, while in states with serious governance challenges the best international anti-corruption efforts will often have surprisingly little to do with corruption at all. In a state where the rule of law is patchy or non-existent then anti-corruption laws (or indeed laws more generally) mean very little. The challenge here is to improve the basic tools of governance in the knowledge that only then can the issue of corruption be brought on to the agenda.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: OECD; UNCAC; corruption; transparency; anti-corruption
Schools and Departments: School of Law, Politics and Sociology > Politics
Research Centres and Groups: Sussex Centre for the Study of Corruption
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Depositing User: Daniel Hough
Date Deposited: 05 Dec 2017 16:49
Last Modified: 18 Oct 2019 01:00

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update