Thorpe, A, Craig, R, Tourish, D, Hadikin, G and Batistic, S (2018) ‘Environment’ submissions in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework 2014. British Journal of Management, 29 (3). pp. 571-587. ISSN 1045-3172

PDF (This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.) - Accepted Version Download (722kB)

Abstract

There has been much debate about university research assessment exercises. In the UK, a major element of the 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) has been the research ‘Environment’. Here we analyse 98 REF2014 ‘Environment’ submissions in Business and Management Studies. We explore whether there are distinctive language-related differences between submissions of high and low ranked universities, and conclude that submission writers have a strong incentive to exaggerate strengths and conceal problems. In addition, innate biases such as the ‘halo’ and ‘velcro’ effects may distract the attention of assessors from a submission’s strengths and weaknesses, since they are likely to influence their pre-existing impressions. We propose several changes to improve how ‘Environment’ is evaluated. We also argue that the research ‘Environment’ would be more likely to be enhanced if the number of outputs submitted in future were an average of two and a maximum of four per academic, rather than the maximum of six currently being considered.

Item Type:	Article
Keywords:	REF, Impression management, Language, Policy implications
Schools and Departments:	University of Sussex Business School > Management
Depositing User:	Stacey Goldup
Date Deposited:	19 Jun 2017 10:28
Last Modified:	11 Dec 2019 02:00
URI:	http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/68710

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update