Does the internet limit human rights protection? The case of revenge porn

Bjarnadóttir, María Rún (2016) Does the internet limit human rights protection? The case of revenge porn. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 7 (3). pp. 204-215. ISSN 2190-3387

[img] PDF (Any party may pass on this Work by electronic means and make it available for download under the terms and conditions of the Digital Peer Publishing Licence (DPPL) [3]) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivatives.

Download (352kB)


With the enhanced distribution possibilities internet brings, online revenge porn has gained spotlight, as reports show that the act can cause serious consequences for victims. Research and reported cases have led to criticism of states lack of legal and executive means to protect victims, not least due to jurisdictional issues. Framing the matter within states responsibility to protect rights under Article 8 of the ECHR, presents the issue of possible breach of human rights obligations of states bound by the Convention. A number of domestic calls for criminalisation of posting of revenge porn have been replied with arguments for freedom of expression, worries that such means will contribute to a fragmented internet, and of a slippery slope of state interference. Further, as revenge porn touches upon the balancing between competing human rights, the possible result of outsourcing human rights assessment to private entities becomes a point of discussion in the paper.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: School of Law, Politics and Sociology > Law
Research Centres and Groups: Sussex Centre for Human Rights Research
Subjects: K Law > K Law in General. Comparative and uniform Law. Jurisprudence
Depositing User: Maria Run Bjarnadottir
Date Deposited: 18 Jan 2017 11:18
Last Modified: 03 Jul 2019 02:48

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update