Austin, Alison J. (2010) Mechanisms of attention for cues associated with rewarding and aversive outcomes. Doctoral thesis (DPhil), University of Sussex.
![]()
|
PDF
- Published Version
Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Attentional biases arising from classical conditioning processes may contribute to the maintenance of drug addictions and anxiety disorders. This thesis examined whether attentional mechanisms for conditioned stimuli (CS) would be dominated by affective properties (Lang, Greenwald, Bradley, & Hamm, 1993), or the uncertainty of the stimulus in predicting the outcome (Pearce & Hall, 1980). In chapter one affective and uncertainty-driven mechanisms of attention are discussed in relation to rewarding and aversive outcomes. In experimental chapter 2 methodological issues are addressed. In experimental
chapters three and four attentional mechanisms are tested using a discriminative conditioning procedure with visual stimuli of varying predictive certainty (CS+,CS+/-,CS-)
for a monetary or noise outcome (US). Attention was measured using an eye-tracker, and emotional conditioning and learning were measured using Likert scales. It was found that attention was mediated by uncertainty (chapter 3), but increasing the intensity of the outcome switched attention to affective-driven mechanisms for the noise outcome (chapter 4). In a further experiment this effect on attention remained for the noise outcome even
under conditions promoting uncertainty-driven mechanisms (chapter 6). When cigarettes were the unconditioned stimuli instead of money in the appetitive conditioning, attention was also mediated by stimulus affect (chapter 5). In chapter 7 the data are discussed and it is concluded that when the outcome is highly emotionally salient, affective-driven mechanisms of attention dominate over uncertainty.
Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
---|---|
Schools and Departments: | School of Psychology > Psychology |
Subjects: | Q Science > QZ Psychology |
Depositing User: | Library Cataloguing |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jan 2011 07:49 |
Last Modified: | 13 Aug 2015 13:58 |
URI: | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/6265 |
Google Scholar: | 385 Citations |
View download statistics for this item
📧 Request an update