University of Sussex
Browse
synthetic_meat_policy_recommendations.pdf (135.33 kB)

Case study on in-vitro meat. WP5 policy report, March/April 2015: summary of findings and policy considerations

Download (135.33 kB)
report
posted on 2023-06-09, 00:42 authored by Kate O'RiordanKate O'Riordan, Kristrun Gunnarsdóttir, Neil Stephens, Aristea Fotopoulou, Kjetil Rommetveit, Brian Wynne, Mario Giampietro, Zora Kovacic;, Louis Lemkow Zetterling, Marina Di Masso Tarditti
The in-vitro meat (IVM) research field remains small with perhaps 50 or so scientists active globally. These scientists are in the Netherlands, the US, the UK, Sweden, Israel and Norway, with some interest expressed in Denmark and by a group of bioreactor engineers in Portugal. The main groups involved in supporting this innovation domain are: New Harvest, a US based pro-IVM campaign group that raises funds through donations for small scale research work, discusses IVM in the media and organises conference panels; the In-Vitro Meat Consortium, established by Dutch and Norwegian scientists in 2008 as a networking device with presence at conferences, although, now with limited activity; the US animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). The most high profile laboratories are those of Mark Post at Maastricht University and the New York based private company Modern Meadow, both of which have become relatively financially secure research sites over the last three years. The aim of the Epinet case study was to explore and interact with these epistemic communities / networks that have been developing, implementing, supporting and promoting IVM technologies. The study team consisted of expertise in sociotechnical evaluations, systems and uncertainty analysis, ethics and media studies. The team identified early on a small set of policy considerations around the issues of public funding and the social shaping of IVM. The question of whether or not IVM research should be publicly funded has had to be viewed in relation to how IVM technologies are represented, understood, shaped and reshaped and, accordingly, what sort of IVM activities should be funded. When the case study commenced in 2012, government policy makers had only twice chosen to fund IVM laboratory work, i.e., a section of the Dutch government interested in environmental issues and protein (2005-2009; 2010-2014), and NASA (~2000). In addition to that, the European Science Foundation (ESF) funded a two day blue skies conference in Gothenburg, Sept. 2011. Other funders include PETA, New Harvest, and private donators.

Funding

EPINET - Media Analysis (FP7); G0854; EUROPEAN UNION; 288971

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Publisher

The Epinet Project

Pages

4.0

Place of publication

Bergen, Norway

Department affiliated with

  • Media and Film Publications

Institution

The Epinet Project

Full text available

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2016-03-31

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2016-03-31

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2016-03-31

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC