University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Variations in vivas: quality and equality in British PhD assessments

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 23:12 authored by Louise Morley, Diana Leonard, Miriam David
This article asks whether doctoral assessment has escaped the regulation of quality assurance procedures. It also raises questions about the affective and micropolitical dimensions of an oral examination conducted in private. It explores how current concerns about quality assurance, standards, benchmarks and performance indicators in higher education apply to the assessment of doctoral/research degrees in Britain, and in particular to the viva voce examination. Successful PhD completion is a key performance indicator for universities and an important basis for the accreditation of their staff. Yet, its form of assessment has not yet been fully examined, despite the rise of new managerialism and a general preoccupation with calculable standards and outcomes. Equally, while the 'customer care' revolution may be entering the academy, with an emphasis on student entitlements, transparency of decision-making and information for 'consumers', there still seems to be considerable variation, and some mystification, in how doctoral assessment is conducted and experienced. The massification of doctoral studies, and the doubling in the number of institutions awarding their own doctorates post-1992, are both likely to increase product variety still further.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

Studies in Higher Education

ISSN

0307-5079

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Issue

3

Volume

27

Page range

263-273

Department affiliated with

  • Education Publications

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2015-11-16

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC