Gentili, Gianluca (2012) A comparison of European systems of direct access to constitutional judges: exploring advantages for the Italian Constitutional Court. Italian Journal of Public Law, 4 (1). pp. 159-208. ISSN 2239-8279

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (423kB) | Preview

Abstract

As protection of fundamental rights increasingly becomes a defining feature of modern constitutionalism, some countries debate over the opportunity to introduce systems of direct individual access to constitutional judges to increase protection of constitutional rights. Part I of the article provides a comparative overview of the systems of individual constitutional complaint adopted in Europe, focusing on their functioning, structure and admissibility requirements. Part II addresses possible benefits of the introduction of such a system in Italy. After describing the main features of the Italian system of judicial review, the article details proposals that, since 1947, have been presented to introduce a system of direct individual access to the Italian Constitutional Court. Finally, Part III offers reflections on the potential advantages that adoption of such complaint would bring to the Italian legal system, compared to the currently existing avenues of access to the Court.

Item Type:	Article
Schools and Departments:	School of Law, Politics and Sociology > Law
Subjects:	J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN5201 Italy K Law > KJ Europe
Related URLs:	Publisher
Depositing User:	Gianluca Gentili
Date Deposited:	13 Oct 2015 13:03
Last Modified:	07 Mar 2017 10:06
URI:	http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/57091

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update