University of Sussex
Browse
JCO.2014.59.4945.full.pdf (794.68 kB)

Risk algorithm using serial biomarker measurements doubles the number of screen-detected cancers compared with a single-threshold rule in the United Kingdom collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening

Download (794.68 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 21:11 authored by Usha Menon, Andy Ryan, Jatinderpal Kalsi, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Anne Dawnay, Mariam Habib, Sophia Apostolidou, Naveena Singh, Elizabeth Benjamin, Matthew Burnell, Susan Davies, Aarti Sharma, Richard Gunu, Keith Godfrey, Alberto Lopes, David Oram, Jonathan Herod, Kevin Williamson, Mourad W Seif, Howard Jenkins, Tim Mould, Robert Woolas, John B Murdoch, Stephen Dobbs, Nazar N Amso, Simon Leeson, Derek Cruickshank, Ian Scott, Lesley FallowfieldLesley Fallowfield, Martin Widschwendter, Karina Reynolds, Alistair McGuire, Stuart Campbell, Mahesh Parmar, Steven J Skates, Ian Jacobs
PURPOSE: Cancer screening strategies have commonly adopted single-biomarker thresholds to identify abnormality. We investigated the impact of serial biomarker change interpreted through a risk algorithm on cancer detection rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening, 46,237 women, age 50 years or older underwent incidence screening by using the multimodal strategy (MMS) in which annual serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) was interpreted with the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA). Women were triaged by the ROCA: normal risk, returned to annual screening; intermediate risk, repeat CA-125; and elevated risk, repeat CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound. Women with persistently increased risk were clinically evaluated. All participants were followed through national cancer and/or death registries. Performance characteristics of a single-threshold rule and the ROCA were compared by using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: After 296,911 women-years of annual incidence screening, 640 women underwent surgery. Of those, 133 had primary invasive epithelial ovarian or tubal cancers (iEOCs). In all, 22 interval iEOCs occurred within 1 year of screening, of which one was detected by ROCA but was managed conservatively after clinical assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of MMS for detection of iEOCs were 85.8% (95% CI, 79.3% to 90.9%) and 99.8% (95% CI, 99.8% to 99.8%), respectively, with 4.8 surgeries per iEOC. ROCA alone detected 87.1% (135 of 155) of the iEOCs. Using fixed CA-125 cutoffs at the last annual screen of more than 35, more than 30, and more than 22 U/mL would have identified 41.3% (64 of 155), 48.4% (75 of 155), and 66.5% (103 of 155), respectively. The area under the curve for ROCA (0.915) was significantly (P = .0027) higher than that for a single-threshold rule (0.869). CONCLUSION: Screening by using ROCA doubled the number of screen-detected iEOCs compared with a fixed cutoff. In the context of cancer screening, reliance on predefined single-threshold rules may result in biomarkers of value being discarded.

Funding

RQ01-G0543; Medical Research Council; G000073

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Journal of Clinical Oncology

ISSN

0732-183X

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology

Issue

18

Volume

33

Page range

2062-2071

Department affiliated with

  • Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C) Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2015-06-18

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2015-06-18

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2015-06-18

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC