File(s) not publicly available
Are some bribes more harmful than others? Exploring the ethics behind anti-bribery laws
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 19:09 authored by Elizabeth David-BarrettElizabeth David-BarrettThe proliferation of anti-bribery laws in recent years, particularly with the passage of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, sends a firm signal to companies that norms concerning corruption in international business have changed. With the increase in legal risk has come an increase in reputational risk. However, these laws and the cultures of enforcement around them, send conflicting messages about bribery being avoidable or indeed unethical. For example, many laws include an exemption or a defence for facilitation payments implying that such bribes are less unethical or that firms have a weaker responsibility to avoid paying them, than is the case for bribes ‘to gain a business advantage’. This article seeks to analyse whether this distinction has a basis in ethics. It suggests that some bribes are less harmful than others in terms of their direct impact. However, all bribes are harmful, because they always undermine the rule of law.
History
Publication status
- Published
Journal
Journal of Interdisciplinary EconomicsISSN
0260-1079Publisher
SAGE PublicationsExternal DOI
Issue
1-2Volume
26Page range
119-144Department affiliated with
- Politics Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2014-11-27Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC