sorry, we can't preview this file
21693293.2013.765740 (46.43 kB)
Representing crowd behaviour in emergency planning guidance: ‘mass panic’ or collective resilience?
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 14:36 authored by John DruryJohn Drury, David Novelli, Clifford StottEmergency planning often includes assumptions about crowd behaviour. These assumptions matter, as they can operate as rationales for emergency management practices. We examined the extent to which crowds are represented in UK emergency planning guidance as psychologically vulnerable or as contributing to psychosocial resilience. A systematic search of 47 guidance documents identified 9 referring to ‘panic’. These were discourse analysed, along with six more guidance documents considered key to civil contingencies resilience. It was found that the references to ‘panic’ served to construct collectives (and particularly crowds) as a source of psychological vulnerability. References to collective sources of resilience in the public were mostly found to be limited and often served to marginalise the crowd as a basis of coping in emergencies. We argue that the emphasis in the current guidance on the marginal role of crowds and the indispensable role of the professionals conflicts with aspects of current policy on community resilience.
History
Publication status
- Published
Journal
Resilience: International Policies, Practices and DiscoursesISSN
2169-3293Publisher
RoutledgeExternal DOI
Issue
1Volume
1Page range
18-37Department affiliated with
- Psychology Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2013-03-15Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC