Booth, Anthony Robert (2011) The theory of epistemic justification and the theory of knowledge: a divorce. Erkenntnis, 75 (1). pp. 37-43. ISSN 0165-0106
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Richard Foley has suggested that the search for a good theory of epistemic justification and the analysis of knowledge should be conceived of as two distinct projects. However, he has not offered much support for this claim, beyond highlighting certain salutary consequences it might have. In this paper, I offer some further support for Foley’s claim by offering an argument and a way to conceive the claim in a way that makes it as plausible as its denial, and thus levelling the playing field. The burden of proof then lies with those who seek to deny Foley’s radical suggestion.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Schools and Departments: | School of History, Art History and Philosophy > Philosophy |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion |
Depositing User: | Anthony Booth |
Date Deposited: | 01 Nov 2012 09:45 |
Last Modified: | 01 Nov 2012 09:45 |
URI: | http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/41110 |