University of Sussex
Browse
Mol._Cell._Biol.-2006-Coldwell-8448-60.pdf (1.44 MB)

Specific isoforms of translation initiation factor 4GI show differences in translational activity

Download (1.44 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 09:42 authored by Mark J Coldwell, Simon Morley
The eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4GI gene locus (eIF4GI) contains three identified promoters, generating alternately spliced mRNAs, yielding a total of five eIF4GI protein isoforms. Although eIF4GI plays a critical role in mRNA recruitment to the ribosomes, little is known about the functions of the different isoforms, their partner binding capacities, or the role of the homolog, eIF4GII, in translation initiation. To directly address this, we have used short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) expressed from DNA vectors to silence the expression of eIF4GI in HeLa cells. Here we show that reduced levels of specific mRNA and eIF4GI isoforms in HeLa cells promoted aberrant morphology and a partial inhibition of translation. The latter reflected dephosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and decreased eIF4F complex levels, with no change in eIF2 alpha phosphorylation. Expression of siRNA-resistant Myc-tagged eIF4GI isoforms has allowed us to show that the different isoforms exhibit significant differences in their ability to restore translation rates. Here we quantify the efficiency of eIF4GI promoter usage in mammalian cells and demonstrate that even though the longest isoform of eIF4GI (eIF4GIf) was relatively poorly expressed when reintroduced, it was more efficient at promoting the translation of cellular mRNAs than the more highly expressed shorter isoforms used in previous functional studies.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

Molecular and Cellular Biology

ISSN

0270-7306

Issue

22

Volume

26

Page range

8448-8460

Pages

13.0

Department affiliated with

  • Biochemistry Publications

Notes

This is the first demonstration of functional differences between the isoforms of eIF4GI in mammalian cells. SM directed the research and was the corresponding author.

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2012-02-06

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2016-03-22

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2017-03-07

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC