University of Sussex
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Adoptive family life and adoption support: policy ambivalence and the development of effective services

journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-08, 08:53 authored by Barry Luckock, Angie Hart
Adoption policy and practice in England is being `modernized¿ in order to increase the number of permanent placements for children in public care. Success depends on improving adoption services as well as reforming the adoption process itself. To this end the Adoption and Children Act 2002 places new duties on local authorities to ensure greater consistency and quality of service in adoption support as well as in care planning. Questions now arise locally about what priority and focus to give to adoption support. Yet service development is inhibited by the ambivalence of New Labour about exactly what it is that adoption support is supposed to be supporting and how. Funds are limited and service re-organization is always difficult to achieve. However, mixed policy messages result largely from the ambiguous social role and expectations of adoptive family life and kinship. In law adoption replicates the autonomous normative birth family whilst in policy it provides reparative parenting for particularly vulnerable children. A lack of clarity about the claims for support of those affected by adoption results. This paper argues a fresh case for the distinctive claims of adoptive family life for support. It suggests how new thinking about adoptive family life and kinship might stimulate local service collaboration and effective adoption support.

History

Publication status

  • Published

Journal

Child and Family Social Work

ISSN

1356-7500

Issue

2

Volume

10

Page range

125-134

Pages

10.0

Department affiliated with

  • Social Work and Social Care Publications

Notes

Written largely by Luckock this paper develops the policy analysis of adoptive support introduced in Hart and Luckock (2004). The original idea of a core ambivalence underpinning practice is illuminated through a close textual analysis of law, regulations and policy documentation. This approach enables policy and practice issues to be considered analytically. The perspective developed in this paper has been developed and extended (Luckock, 2008, 'Adoption support and the negotiation of ambivalence in family policy and children's services', Journal of Law and Society).

Full text available

  • No

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2012-02-06

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC