Endersby, Jim (2009) Lumpers and splitters: Darwin, Hooker, and the search for order. Science, 326 (5959). pp. 1496-1499. ISSN 0036-8075

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Classification was a key practice of the natural history sciences in the early 19th century, but leading taxonomists disagreed over basic matters, such as how many species the British flora contained. In this arena, the impact of Charles Darwin's ideas was surprisingly limited. For taxonomists like Darwin's friend, Joseph Dalton Hooker, the priority was to establish a reputation as a philosophical naturalist, and to do so Hooker embarked on a survey of global vegetation patterns. He believed that taxonomic "splitters" hindered his ambition to create natural laws for botany (and hence establish it as a prestigious science) by generating a multitude of redundant synonyms for every plant variety. Despite the fact that Darwin¿s ideas apparently promised a justification for splitting, they also offered a philosophical justification for Hooker¿s taxonomic practice, and so he enthusiastically championed his friend.

Item Type:	Article
Schools and Departments:	School of History, Art History and Philosophy > History
Subjects:	D History General and Old World > D History (General)
Depositing User:	Jim Endersby
Date Deposited:	06 Feb 2012 18:19
Last Modified:	25 Jul 2012 13:45
URI:	http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/15803

📧 Request an update