File(s) not publicly available
Lumpers and splitters: Darwin, Hooker, and the search for order
Classification was a key practice of the natural history sciences in the early 19th century, but leading taxonomists disagreed over basic matters, such as how many species the British flora contained. In this arena, the impact of Charles Darwin's ideas was surprisingly limited. For taxonomists like Darwin's friend, Joseph Dalton Hooker, the priority was to establish a reputation as a philosophical naturalist, and to do so Hooker embarked on a survey of global vegetation patterns. He believed that taxonomic "splitters" hindered his ambition to create natural laws for botany (and hence establish it as a prestigious science) by generating a multitude of redundant synonyms for every plant variety. Despite the fact that Darwin¿s ideas apparently promised a justification for splitting, they also offered a philosophical justification for Hooker¿s taxonomic practice, and so he enthusiastically championed his friend.
History
Publication status
- Published
Journal
ScienceISSN
0036-8075Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of ScienceExternal DOI
Issue
5959Volume
326Page range
1496-1499Pages
4.0Department affiliated with
- History Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2012-02-06Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC