Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review

Sorrell, Steve, Dimitropoulos, John and Sommerville, Matt (2009) Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37 (4). pp. 1356-1371. ISSN 0301-4215

Full text not available from this repository.


Beginning with William Stanley Jevons in 1865, a number of authors have claimed that economically justified energy-efficiency improvements will increase rather than reduce energy consumption. 'Jevons Paradox' is extremely difficult to test empirically, but could have profound implications for energy and climate policy. This paper summarises and critiques the arguments and evidence that have been cited in support of Jevons' Paradox, focusing in particular on the work of Len Brookes and Harry Saunders. It identifies some empirical and theoretical weaknesses in these arguments, highlights the questions they raise for economic orthodoxy and points to some interesting parallels between these arguments and those used by the 'biophysical' school of ecological economics. While the evidence in favour of 'Jevons Paradox' is far from conclusive, it does suggest that economy-wide rebound effects are larger than is conventionally assumed and that energy plays a more important role in driving productivity improvements and economic growth than is conventionally assumed. 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Schools and Departments: University of Sussex Business School > SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit
Depositing User: Steven Sorrell
Date Deposited: 06 Feb 2012 18:11
Last Modified: 20 Mar 2012 22:38
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/15141
📧 Request an update