File(s) not publicly available
Children's differentiation between beliefs about matters of fact and matters of opinion.
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-07, 18:45 authored by Robin BanerjeeRobin Banerjee, Nicola YuillNicola Yuill, Christina Larson, Kate Easton, Elizabeth Robinson, Martin RowleyTwo experiments investigated children's implicit and explicit differentiation between beliefs about matters of fact and matters of opinion. In Experiment 1, 8- to 9-year-olds' (n = 88) explicit understanding of the subjectivity of opinions was found to be limited, but their conformity to others' judgments on a matter of opinion was considerably lower than their conformity to others' views regarding an ambiguous fact. In Experiment 2, children aged 6, 8, or 10 years (n = 81) were asked to make judgments either about ambiguous matters of fact or about matters of opinion and then heard an opposing judgment from an expert. All age groups conformed to the opposing judgments on factual matters more than they did to the experts' views on matters of opinion. However, only the oldest children explicitly recognized that opinions are subjective and cannot be "wrong." Implications of these results for models of children's reasoning about epistemic states are discussed.
History
Publication status
- Published
Journal
Developmental PsychologyISSN
0012-1649External DOI
Issue
5Volume
43Page range
1084-1096Department affiliated with
- Psychology Publications
Full text available
- No
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2012-02-06Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC