Tourish Response.pdf (168.57 kB)
On crisis, genuine imposters, and complacency in management studies
I am grateful to all those who responded to my original ‘provocation.’ In this short response I will mostly take our areas of agreement as read. However, I will clarify some issues that have arisen, and then focus on where disagreements exist. It is worth reiterating what has brought this debate into being. Fundamentally, many of us are concerned about our publishing practices, including what we write about and how we do it. Audit, accountability and ranking systems have proliferated, bringing with them escalating demands about how much we need to publish (Warren, 2019) and where we must publish it (Tusting, 2019). This also affects how we write and what we need to write about in order to do secure publication in a prized elite of ‘A’ journals (Frémeaux, et al, 2019; Yoshikawa, 2019; Aguinis et al, 2020). Since these journals stress theory development above all else, most of us focus ever more on developing theory as our main goal. Other objectives become less important or disappear altogether.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Accepted version
Journal
Academy of Management Learning and EducationISSN
1537-260XPublisher
Academy of ManagementExternal DOI
Issue
2Volume
19Page range
247-251Department affiliated with
- Management Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2023-04-13First Open Access (FOA) Date
2023-04-13First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2023-04-13Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC