Coen_Herman_Pegram_2022.pdf (4.82 MB)
Are corporate climate efforts genuine? An empirical analysis of the climate ‘talk–walk’ hypothesis
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-10, 05:55 authored by David Coen, Kyle HermanKyle Herman, Tom PegramThis study conducts machine-aided textual analysis on 725 corporate sustainability reports and empirically tests whether climate ‘talk’ within the sampled reports translates into performance ‘walk’, proxied by changes in greenhouse gas emissions over a 10-year period. We find mixed results for the ‘talk–walk’ hypothesis, depending on the type of talk and the associated climate change actors involved. Indeed, our empirical models show that while some climate commitments are genuine, many constitute little more than ‘greenwashing’—producing symbolic rather than substantive action. We attribute this result to false signalling of climate transitioning in order to mislead due to misaligned incentives. An unexpected positive finding of the study is that talk about operational improvements is a significant predictor of climate performance improvement. On the other hand, reactive strategies are consistent with poor climate performance. Our findings highlight the significance of corporate climate strategies other than emissions reductions in assessing the effective contribution of business to the climate transition.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
Business Strategy and the EnvironmentISSN
0964-4733Publisher
WileyExternal DOI
Issue
7Volume
31Page range
3040-3059Department affiliated with
- SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2023-01-10First Open Access (FOA) Date
2023-01-10First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2023-01-09Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC