From savages to snowflakes: race and the enemies of free speech

Right wing free speech advocacy is increasingly shaping global politics. In IR, free speech has generally been viewed within human rights and international legal frameworks. However, this article shows that contemporary free speech advocates often ignore or oppose human rights and international law, focussing instead on (what they describe as) a defence of the nation state against the enemies of free speech. This article examines this articulation of free speech’s enemies: first historically as the ‘savage’ in John Stuart Mill’s influential formulation of free speech; and then contemporarily as the ‘snowflake’, ‘mob’ and ‘cultural Marxist’ by elected officials and lobbyists in the UK and US. The article argues that John Stuart Mill’s savage is figured within a racialised civilizational hierarchy of degrees of humanity. Today, right wing free speech advocates extend and reconfigure this hierarchy, imagining the ‘snowflake’, ‘mob’ and ‘cultural Marxist’ as lesser human, sub human and extra-human respectively. Thus, in contrast to rights-based analyses of free speech advocacy – which assume or assess the promotion of rights as a ‘public good’ – the article argues that narratives of free speech’s enemies are deployed by right wing free speech advocates to underwrite racialised policy responses and global hierarchies.