University of Sussex
Browse
Manuscript 3.pdf (135.31 kB)

Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is "Better"

Download (135.31 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-10, 05:46 authored by Chantelle RizanChantelle Rizan, Mahmood BhuttaMahmood Bhutta
No description supplied

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Accepted version

Journal

Journal of Endourology

ISSN

1557-900X

Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert

External DOI

Issue

11

Volume

36

Page range

1466-1467

Event location

United States

Department affiliated with

  • Clinical and Experimental Medicine Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2023-01-04

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2023-01-04

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2023-01-04

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    HumansCystoscopesCarbon FootprintCystoscopyFiber Optic Technology

    Licence

    Copyright not evaluated

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC