The distinct associations of ingroup attachment and glorification with responses to the coronavirus pandemic: evidence from a multilevel investigation in 21 countries

McLamore, Quinnehtukqut, Syropoulos, Stylianos, Leidner, Bernhard, Hirschberger, Gilad, van Bezouw, Maarten J, Rovenpor, Daniel, Paladino, Maria Paola, Baumert, Anna, Bilewicz, Michal, Bilgen, Arda, Chatard, Armand, Chekroun, Peggy, Chinchilla, Juana, Choi, Hoon-Seok, Ulug, Melis and others, (2022) The distinct associations of ingroup attachment and glorification with responses to the coronavirus pandemic: evidence from a multilevel investigation in 21 countries. British Journal of Social Psychology. pp. 1-21. ISSN 0144-6665

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Restricted to SRO admin only

Download (1MB)

Abstract

While public health crises such as the coronavirus pandemic transcend national borders, practical efforts to combat them are often instantiated at the national level. Thus, national group identities may play key roles in shaping compliance with and support for preventative measures (e.g., hygiene and lockdowns). Using data from 25,159 participants across representative samples from 21 nations, we investigated how different modalities of ingroup identification (attachment and glorification) are linked with reactions to the coronavirus pandemic (compliance and support for lockdown restrictions). We also examined the extent to which the associations of attachment and glorification with responses to the coronavirus pandemic are mediated through trust in information about the coronavirus pandemic from scientific and government sources. Multilevel models suggested that attachment, but not glorification, was associated with increased trust in science and compliance with federal COVID-19 guidelines. However, while both attachment and glorification were associated with trust in government and support for lockdown restrictions, glorification was more strongly associated with trust in government information than attachment. These results suggest that both attachment and glorification can be useful for promoting public health, although glorification's role, while potentially stronger, is restricted to pathways through trust in government information.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: "The distinct associations of ingroup attachment and glorification with responses to the coronavirus pandemic: evidence from a multilevel investigation in 21 countries", which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12614. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
Schools and Departments: School of Psychology > Psychology
SWORD Depositor: Mx Elements Account
Depositing User: Mx Elements Account
Date Deposited: 03 Jan 2023 14:36
Last Modified: 03 Jan 2023 14:45
URI: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/109742

View download statistics for this item

📧 Request an update