University of Sussex
Browse
Experience of discrimination during COVID-19 pandemic the impact of public health measures and psychological distress among .pdf (1.11 MB)

Experience of discrimination during COVID-19 pandemic: the impact of public health measures and psychological distress among refugees and other migrants in Europe

Download (1.11 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-10, 05:30 authored by Mattia Marchi, Federico M Magarini, Antonio Chiarenza, Gian M Galeazzi, Virginia Paloma, Rocio Garrido, Elizabeth Ioannidi, Katerina Vassilikou, Margarida G de Matos, Tania Gaspar, Fabio B Guedes, Nina L Primdahl, Morten Skovdal, Rebecca Murphy, Natalie Durbeej, Fatumo Osman, Charles WattersCharles Watters, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Gesine Sturm, Rachid Oulahal, Beatriz Padilla, Sara Willems, Eva Spiritus-Beerden, An Verelst, Ilse Derluyn
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a disproportionately hard impact on refugees and other migrants who are often exposed to the virus with limited means to protect themselves. We tested the hypothesis that during the COVID-19 pandemic, refugees and other migrants have suffered a negative impact on mental health and have been unjustly discriminated for spreading the disease in Europe (data collection from April to November 2020). Methods Participants in the ApartTogether Survey (N?= 8297, after listwise deletion of missing items final N?= 3940) provided data regarding to their difficulties to adhere to preventive recommendations against COVID-19 infection (CARE), self-perceived stigmatization (SS), and psychological distress (PD). Structural Equation Modeling was used to investigate PD as a mediator in the pathway linking CARE to SS, while adjusting for the housing and residence status. To improve confidence in the findings, single hold-out sample cross-validation was performed using a train/test split ratio of 0.8/0.2. Results In the exploratory set (N?= 3159) SS was associated with both CARE (B?=?0.200, p?< 0.001) and PD (B?=?0.455, p?< 0.001). Moreover, PD was also associated with CARE (B?=?0.094, p?=?0.001) and mediated the effect of CARE on SS (proportion mediated?=?17.7%, p?=?0.001). The results were successfully replicated in the confirmation set (N?= 781; total effect?=?0.417, p?< 0.001; proportion mediated?=?29.7%, p?< 0.001). Follow-up analyses also found evidence for an opposite effect (i.e., from SS to CARE, B?=?0.132; p?< 0.001), suggesting that there might be a vicious circle between the self-perceived stigmatization and the access to health care and the use of preventive measures against COVID-19 infection. Conclusions Refugees and other migrants who had more difficulties in accessing health care and preventive measures against COVID-19 infection experienced worse mental health and increased discrimination. These negative effects appeared to be stronger for those with more insecure housing and residence status, highlighting from one side the specific risk of insecure housing in the impact of COVID-19 upon mental health and infection protection, and for another side the need to proper housing as a strategy to prevent both COVID-19 and mental distress.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

BMC Public Health

ISSN

1471-2458

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Volume

22

Page range

942 1-14

Event location

England

Department affiliated with

  • Social Work and Social Care Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2022-11-18

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2022-11-18

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2022-11-18

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC