elife-72185-v2.pdf (467.78 kB)
Consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-10, 03:33 authored by Balazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi, Gustav Nilsonne, Olmo R Van Den Akker, Casper J Albers, Marcel A Van Assen, Jojanneke A Bastiaansen, Daniel Benjamin, Udo Boehm, Rotem Botvinik-Nezer, Laura F Bringmann, Niko A Busch, Emmanuel Caruyer, Andrea M Cataldo, Raphael Silberzahn, othersAny large dataset can be analyzed in a number of ways, and it is possible that the use of different analysis strategies will lead to different results and conclusions. One way to assess whether the results obtained depend on the analysis strategy chosen is to employ multiple analysts and leave each of them free to follow their own approach. Here, we present consensus-based guidance for conducting and reporting such multi-analyst studies, and we discuss how broader adoption of the multi-analyst approach has the potential to strengthen the robustness of results and conclusions obtained from analyses of datasets in basic and applied research.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
eLifeISSN
2050-084XPublisher
eLife Sciences PublicationsExternal DOI
Volume
10Page range
1-13Article number
a72185Event location
EnglandDepartment affiliated with
- Management Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2022-05-13First Open Access (FOA) Date
2022-05-13First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2022-05-13Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC