1-s2.0-S0305750X22000791-main.pdf (405.56 kB)
Decentred regulation: the case of private healthcare in India
Version 2 2023-06-12, 07:43
Version 1 2023-06-10, 02:52
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 07:43 authored by Benjamin Hunter, Susan F Murray, Shweta Marathe, Indira ChakravarthiIn order to progress towards more equitable social welfare systems we need an improved understanding of regulation in social sectors such as health and education. However, research to date has tended to focus on roles for governments and professions, overlooking the broader range of regulatory systems that emerge in contexts of market-based provisioning and partial state regulation. In this article we examine the regulation of private healthcare in India using an analytical approach informed by ‘decentred’ and ‘regulatory capitalism’ perspectives. We apply these ideas to qualitative data on private healthcare and its regulation in Maharashtra (review of press media, semi-structured interviews with 43 respondents, and three witness seminars), in order to describe the range of state and non-state actors involved in setting rules and norms in this context, whose interests are represented by these activities, and what problems arise. We show an eclectic set of regulatory systems in operation. Government and statutory councils do perform limited and sporadic regulatory roles, typically organised around legislation, licensing and inspections, and often prompted by the judicial arm of the state. But a range of industry-level actors, private organisations and public insurers are involved too, promoting their own interests in the sector via the offices of regulatory capitalism: accreditation companies, insurers, platform operators and consumer courts. Rules and norms are extensive but diffuse. These are produced not just through laws, licensing and professional codes of conduct, but also through industry influence over standards, practices and market organisation, and through individualised attempts to negotiate exceptions and redressal. Our findings demonstrate regulation in a marketised social sector to be partial, disjointed and decentred to multiple loci, actively representing differing interests. Greater understanding of the different actors and processes at play in such contexts can inform future progress towards universal systems for social welfare.
History
Publication status
- Published
File Version
- Published version
Journal
World DevelopmentISSN
0305-750XPublisher
ElsevierExternal DOI
Volume
155Page range
1-13Article number
a105889Department affiliated with
- Anthropology Publications
Full text available
- Yes
Peer reviewed?
- Yes
Legacy Posted Date
2022-03-10First Open Access (FOA) Date
2022-04-11First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date
2022-03-09Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC