University of Sussex
Browse
s13104-022-05949-w.pdf (808.78 kB)

Reforms to improve reproducibility and quality must be coordinated across the research ecosystem: the view from the UKRN Local Network Leads

Download (808.78 kB)
Version 2 2023-06-12, 07:42
Version 1 2023-06-10, 02:48
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-12, 07:42 authored by Suzanne L K Stewart, Charlotte R Pennington, Gonçalo R da Silva, Nick Ballou, Jessica Butler, Zoltan DienesZoltan Dienes, Caroline Jay, Stephanie Rossit, Anna Samara, U. K. Reproducibility Network (UKRN) Local Network Leads
Many disciplines are facing a "reproducibility crisis", which has precipitated much discussion about how to improve research integrity, reproducibility, and transparency. A unified effort across all sectors, levels, and stages of the research ecosystem is needed to coordinate goals and reforms that focus on open and transparent research practices. Promoting a more positive incentive culture for all ecosystem members is also paramount. In this commentary, we-the Local Network Leads of the UK Reproducibility Network-outline our response to the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's inquiry on research integrity and reproducibility. We argue that coordinated change is needed to create (1) a positive research culture, (2) a unified stance on improving research quality, (3) common foundations for open and transparent research practice, and (4) the routinisation of this practice. For each of these areas, we outline the roles that individuals, institutions, funders, publishers, and Government can play in shaping the research ecosystem. Working together, these constituent members must also partner with sectoral and coordinating organisations to produce effective and long-lasting reforms that are fit-for-purpose and future-proof. These efforts will strengthen research quality and create research capable of generating far-reaching applications with a sustained impact on society.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

BMC Research Notes

ISSN

1756-0500

Publisher

BMC

Issue

1

Volume

15

Page range

1-5

Article number

a58

Event location

England

Department affiliated with

  • Psychology Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Legacy Posted Date

2022-03-04

First Open Access (FOA) Date

2022-03-04

First Compliant Deposit (FCD) Date

2022-03-03

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC